Skip to main content
All Posts By

Take Creative Control

Web3 and the Fight for Artistic Sovereignty

By Artists, Blockchain, Creator Rights, Equity, Music Tech, Web3

In the second episode of Creative Iterations, Take Creative Control’s Kim Tignor and Hollis Wong-Wear sit down with artist and technologist Latasha and collector-curator Sian Morson to unpack one of the most charged questions in today’s cultural economy: Can Web3 technology actually deliver power back to creators?

What is Web3 Anyway?

Web3 refers to a decentralized version of the internet built on blockchain technology. The implications for creatives is pretty incredible. Instead of relying on centralized intermediaries—record labels, galleries, or social-media platforms—it allows individuals to verify and exchange ownership directly through digital wallets, smart contracts, and non-fungible tokens (NFTs).

Web3’s core promise is summarized in three words: Read. Write. Own.

  • Read: Access content freely. 
  • Write: Create and publish. 
  • Own: Retain control over identity, assets, and data.

For artists, this shift could mean the difference between leasing visibility and owning equity. Verified blockchain allows creators to track sales, automate royalties, and engage directly with supporters without intermediaries taking a disproportionate share.

Early Momentum and Lessons Learned

When the first wave of Web3 enthusiasm hit in 2021, many artists found new financial freedom. Latasha, an early adopter, described earning the equivalent of a record deal in months—without surrendering her masters or creative control. Collectors like Morson championed a new culture of intentional patronage: “Buy what you love. That’s where the value is.”

But the downturn that followed revealed how fragile this ecosystem still is. As crypto markets fell, some platforms quietly disabled artist royalties, showing that decentralization on paper doesn’t always mean shared power in practice. The lesson: without creator governance, even “disruptive” tech can replicate old hierarchies.

Identity as Infrastructure

Web3 identity systems—verified through decentralized networks rather than corporate databases—carry special meaning for historically excluded creators. They allow artists to protect and prove authorship across platforms, maintain reputational capital independent of algorithms, and build communities that are portable rather than platform-bound.

For artists of color, this represents not just inclusion but self-determination. As Latasha said, “We can’t afford to be left behind again.”

The Path Forward: Building a Creator-Led Web3

The next phase of Web3 must be creator-built—not only used by artists, but designed and governed by them. The early promise of decentralization faltered when platforms and investors re-centralized control, proving that ownership on paper means little without ownership in code, governance, and infrastructure.

A creator-built Web3 requires intentional design around four principles:

  • Ownership and Interoperability: Artists must control their data, creative assets, and audience relationships across platforms. Blockchain and decentralized storage make this possible, eliminating dependence on a single intermediary. 
  • Transparent Compensation: Smart contracts should embed fair royalty and resale terms that are visible, automatic, and tamper-proof. Artists deserve predictable revenue, not algorithmic luck. 
  • Community Governance: Through decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and cooperative protocols, creators and their audiences can co-own the systems they rely on, setting policy collectively rather than deferring to opaque corporate hierarchies. 
  • Open Infrastructure: Open-source, accessible codebases let independent creators and developers build new tools without gatekeeping. This is how culture scales—through shared innovation, not proprietary control.

Platforms like Zora, Lens Protocol, and Sound.xyz already demonstrate early models of this shift. Latasha’s forthcoming platform, In Process, extends it further—helping creators monetize and archive their behind-the-scenes work while keeping agency over their intellectual property. These examples point toward an ecosystem where creators are not platform tenants but infrastructure architects.

At Take Creative Control, we see this moment as a design challenge, not a market trend. Web3’s true test is whether it can evolve from speculative hype into a functional, equitable infrastructure that respects the people who make culture. That means investment in creator literacy—understanding contracts, governance models, and data rights—as much as in technology itself.

When creators shape the systems that distribute and define cultural value, decentralization becomes more than a technical experiment—it becomes a civic act. The future of creativity depends on infrastructure that is transparent, interoperable, and rooted in dignity.

Listen and Learn

Creative Iterations is our space to hold these conversations in public—and to push forward a vision that centers ownership, transparency, and dignity.

Listen to the full episode featuring Latasha and Sian Morson, and follow them at @callmelatasha and @sianmorson.

Listen to the full podcast here.

 

Willonius Hatcher on Creativity, AI, and the Viral Journey of “BBL Drizzy”

By AI, Creators, Hip Hop, Internet, Music, Social Media

In a world where technology is reshaping the creative landscape, Willonius Hatcher is a pioneer standing at the crossroads of artistry and AI innovation. As an award-winning filmmaker, comedian, and storyteller, Hatcher has used AI to craft groundbreaking projects, including the viralhit and sample “BBL Drizzy,” which sparked conversations globally about creativity, originality, and the role of artificial intelligence in the creator economy.

In our recent Creative Iterations podcast, hosted by Take Creative Control’s Kim Tignor and Hollis Wong-Wear, Hatcher delved into his creative process, the impact of AI tools on his artistry, and the significance of ownership in the digital age. Here’s a closer look at the insights he shared, enriched by broader industry discussions about generative AI.

The Birth of “BBL Drizzy”

“BBL Drizzy” emerged during what Hatcher describes as a moment of creative experimentation. He was participating in a 48-hour AI film festival, working intensely on a video project, when he decided to take a break and experiment with AI music tools. Within hours, Hatcher created a track that would go on to spark global intrigue.

Initially uploaded without much fanfare, the song quickly gained traction on social media, proving the unpredictable nature of virality. Reflecting on the moment, Hatcher said, “I was in such a flow state this year, releasing something almost every week. I didn’t think much of it until my phone started blowing up with messages and notifications.”

The virality of BBL Drizzy was amplified further when renowned producer Metro Boomin remixed it. Not long after, Drake and rapper Sexxy Red sampled the track, making it one of the first mainstream music hits to integrate an AI-generated component.

What Does It Mean to Be Original in the Age of AI?

Generative AI systems like the tools Hatcher uses operate by analyzing vast datasets to identify patterns and generate new content. However, as industry experts point out, this process is fundamentally rooted in recombining pre-existing material, raising questions about the authenticity of “originality.” Axel Schwanke, writing on the limitations of generative AI, notes that while these tools can enhance human creativity, they lack the ability to innovate or infuse work with genuine emotional depth.

For Hatcher, originality in the era of AI is about leveraging these tools to bring creative visions to life while maintaining authorship over the work. He emphasized, “I write everything I make. AI helps with execution, but the ideas, lyrics, and creative direction are uniquely mine.”

Hatcher’s journey aligns with views expressed in the Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, which highlights the ethical dilemmas posed by generative AI. Artists like Hatcher are navigating uncharted territory where traditional notions of originality must evolve to accommodate tools that blur the lines between human creation and machine assistance.

The Challenges and Rewards of the AI-Driven Creator Economy

Hatcher is candid about the hurdles he has faced as a creator in the AI space. While the success of BBL Drizzy opened doors, it also brought challenges in navigating intellectual property, revenue generation, and ethical complexities.

Generative AI, as explored in the Harvard Business Review, has the potential to disrupt creative industries by flooding the market with AI-generated content. This, coupled with the use of copyrighted material in training AI models, has raised legal and ethical concerns. Hatcher, however, remains optimistic, championing a creator-first approach: “If we’re making things that are impactful, we should be able to monetize them and protect our work. Creators deserve the chance to build wealth and pass it on to their families.”

The Democratization of Creativity

One of Hatcher’s key messages is the democratizing power of AI tools. For him, the rise of AI represents an opportunity for creators from diverse backgrounds to bypass traditional gatekeeping and realize their visions independently.

“You don’t need a Hollywood budget to make something impactful,” he shared. “With AI, you can create an entire feature film on your laptop, doing voices, animations, and more on your own. It’s not about waiting for someone to tell you your idea is good. You can just go out and make it.”

This ethos resonates with discussions in the Georgetown Journal, which emphasizes the role of AI in empowering historically marginalized creators. The ability to bypass traditional barriers democratizes access to creative platforms, allowing creators to innovate on their own terms.

The Future of Creativity and Regulation

Hatcher’s story highlights the urgent need for regulatory clarity around generative AI. As AI continues to disrupt creative industries, it is critical to establish frameworks that protect creators while encouraging innovation. Without such protections, the growing influx of AI-generated content could dilute the value of human artistry and exacerbate disparities in the creator economy.

As the Harvard Business Review argues, the challenge lies in finding a balance where technology acts as a complement to human creativity rather than a replacement. For Hatcher, this balance involves continuous learning and adaptation: “Surround yourself with good people, stay consistent, and keep refining your craft. AI is a tool—but it’s up to us to use it thoughtfully.”

Looking Ahead

For Hatcher, the future of creativity is as much about ethics and inclusion as it is about innovation. He hopes to see more creators of color at the forefront of technological advancements and envisions a world where creators are valued and compensated fairly. His story is a powerful reminder of the potential of AI to amplify human creativity while emphasizing the importance of protecting and celebrating original work.

At Take Creative Control, we’re proud to spotlight innovators like Willonius Hatcher, who challenge norms and redefine what’s possible in the creator economy. His journey reminds us that with the right tools, mindset, and support, creators can not only thrive but shape culture in profound ways.

Listen to the full podcast here.